src: i.ytimg.com
Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co., 571 U.S. ___ (2013), is a United States Supreme Court case. In this case, the court considered whether the agreed-upon limitations period for filing a legal objection to long-term disability denial began when the claim was filed or the claim received a final denial. In a unanimous decision, the court ruled the agreed-upon limitations period is neither too short nor is there a statute that prevents it from taking effect, as such the courts are bound to enforce the limitations period and its start date as written in the coverage plan.
Video Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co.
References
Maps Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co.
External links
- Text of Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co., 571 U.S. ___ (2013) is available from: Cornell CourtListener Google Scholar Justia Oyez Supreme Court (slip opinion)
Source of article : Wikipedia
0 Comments